Thursday, January 14, 2016

THE STATE OF THE GOP: MORE MUSH FROM THE WIMPS…AND LET CHRISTIE BE CHRISTIE

1/14/16

A few thoughts as we head into the Fox Business GOP debate in Charleston, S.C. tonight.

The GOP establishment’s standard-bearers in the presidential race aren’t man enough to take on Donald Trump directly, unless we consider a few indignant sniffs from colossal failure Jeb Bush about Mr. Trump’s failure to follow the Marquess of Queensberry rules to be confrontation.   Instead, they trot out South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley to attack Mr. Trump in a speech that was supposed to be a response to President Obama’s State of the Union address.   And even Ms. Haley lacked the intestinal fortitude to call out Mr. Trump by name.  Instead, assuming everyone would know whom she was talking about while maintaining plausible deniability, she warned against “the siren call of the angriest voices” and the GOP’s “not always being responsible with their words in terms of extending our tent.”  The latter comment, by the way, is especially curious given that Mr. Trump is the only GOPer who seems to be drawing outsiders into the GOP tent, but I digress.

After the speech, Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, the epitome of the GOP establishment, went out of his way to tell everyone what a terrific job Ms. Haley had done:

“Governor Haley did a great job with her speech, had the pen, and didn’t need much input from us.”

Thus, anyone whose most salient characteristic is not naiveté can safely conclude not only that Ms. Haley’s speech was awful and woefully misdirected, but also that it was written for her by the cowering, milquetoast, lily-livered GOP establishment.

Given the timidity of the other guys who purport to be qualified to defend the free world, can there be much wonder that the rank and file of the GOP and/or just typical fed up voters find it so easy to support someone so otherwise unsupportable as Mr. Trump?   (See WHY TRUMP IS SOPOPULAR WITH THE MIDDLE CLASS, 12/26/15 for more insight on this matter.)


The guy to watch at the debate tonight is Chris Christie.   As my regular readers know, Mr. Christie has been moving up rapidly in the polls as the GOP establishment decides he is the guy who can carry their standard while keeping the Party is a reasonable degree of unity; see CHRIS CHRISTIE GETS “IT”; CAN HE GET THE NOMINATION?, 1/5/16 for greater insight into Mr. Christie’s ascent and prospects.

The great question is whether Mr. Christie comes out firing on all cylinders, guns ablazin’, both barrels firing…or whether he decides it’s time to start playing the “statesman” and cower in the corner with the likes of Jeb Bush for fear of alienating the high priests and priestesses of political correctness in the national media.

If I were advising Mr. Christie, I would advise him, at the expense of sounding trite, to let Christie be Christie.   If Mr. Trump’s popularity is any indication, there is a large contingent of the electorate who likes a guy who calls them as he sees them and who gives no quarter to political correctness and the incessant and endemic fear of offending.   Such an approach is in Mr. Christie’s DNA; why suppress such innate characteristics at the very time that the electorate is clamoring for fearless, if not reckless, honesty?  Given the public’s increasing aversion to pusillanimity, this is no time for Mr. Christie to adopt a Bushesque attitude of “Oh, I’m so very sorry; I’ll make sure to never adopt any real convictions for fear of your possibly not liking me.”

Further, those who are longtime fans and supporters of Mr. Christie like not so much his policies, which are not all that different from any run of the mill Republicans, but, rather, his style.   They like that he is direct, confident, and, at times, bordering on the rude when dealing with people who deserve to be treated that way.   His supporters like that Mr. Christie brooks no nonsense from those who can roll over a more conventional politician with cries of racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, big moneyism, or any number of imagined transgressions of the doctrines of all that is good and pure in the febrile minds of those who decide such things.   These people would be very disappointed were Mr. Christie to, as one of the few recent Western leaders with any sense of courage or commitment would put it, go wobbly on them.  And this is no time for Mr. Christie to abandon his base in an effort to become more conventional like, say, Mitt Romney or John McCain.

No comments:

Post a Comment