Monday, January 30, 2017

NOTE TO THE ANTI-TRUMP HERD: THE PRESIDENT UNDERSTANDS ECONOMICS…AND HE’S WAY AHEAD OF YOU

1/30/17

In the wake of President Trump’s indications that Mexico will “pay for the (border) wall” with some sort of 20% export tax, observers are pointing out that it is we, the American consumers, who will ultimately pay for the wall if the financing mechanism is indeed some kind of export tax.

As the kids would say, “Well, duh!”   Those who raise this argument do so as if they have suddenly realized some economic truth that is beyond the grasp of Mr. Trump, whom they consider an idiot on all counts.   This low estimation by his opponents of Mr. Trump’s mental capacity is ceaseless despite the Trump campaign’s making idiots of those very same opponents who guffawed at the very notion that Mr. Trump could win the 2016 presidential election, but I digress.   The point is that those who assume that Mr. Trump fails to understand that consumers ultimately pay tariffs and the like also assume that Mr. Trump has the economic literacy of, say, his opponent in the 2016 election or any other lifelong politician.  Of course Mr. Trump understands that some portion of a tariff is paid by consumers.

Let me make two technical digressions here.  First, note that in the last sentence of the last paragraph, yours truly said that Mr. Trump understands that “some portion of a tariff is paid by consumers.”   I didn’t say, as do most commentators on this point, that consumers will pay the entire tariff or that, as is often said, sellers will “pass along” the cost of a tariff, or any cost increase, for that matter.   Indeed, sellers don’t “pass along” an entire tariff.  The cost of a tariff is shared by both the producer and the consumer.   The proportion paid by each is determined by their relative elasticities of demand and supply.   The party with the lowest elasticity (of supply in the case of the producer and of demand in the case of the consumer) will pay a higher proportion of the tariff.  In common English, the seller, in this case Mexico, will pass along what it can and eat what it can’t.  This is rather basic microeconomics.   Whether Mr. Trump and his people understand this fine point I don’t know, but I am reasonably confident, based on their own statements, that his opponents don’t grasp this nuance.

Second, we are not talking a straight-out tariff here, or at least one would think we are not talking about a straight-out tariff here.   Like most of Mr. Trump’s proposals, this one, too, is vague and probably will remain so until about five minutes before it’s put into effect.   Currently, however, the talk is that the tax will be structured as an adjustment to the corporate income tax in which imports will not be deductible and exports will not be taxed, or something like that.  Or it might be something else, and no one is sure where the 20% number came from.   But so it goes with Mr. Trump; he keeps both his fans and his opponents, and the great majority of Americans, who are neither, in suspense.   For those of you who share yours truly’s affection for great old movies “You know how the Premier likes surprises.”

So Mr. Trump knows, despite the seemingly brilliant economic observations of his opponents, that any kind of export tax from Mexico will be paid for, in some proportion, by consumers.   Given that knowledge, why does he still contend that “Mexico will pay” for the wall?    It seems quite obvious:   The export tax is nothing more than a negotiating stance, a stick to prod Mexico to come up with at least some of the cost of the wall.   Mexico, when faced with the choice of either paying for the wall or seeing their exports to the U.S. taxed, one way or the other, at 20%, will be a lot more amenable to, shall we say, contributing to the cost of the wall, than they would be without the incentives provided by this Damaclesian tax.       


As things stand right now, Mexico has no incentive to contribute anything to the construction of a border wall.   The prospect of a tax on its exports to the U.S. will provide a measure of an incentive.   If it doesn’t, don’t be surprised if Mr. Trump comes up with something else to incentivize Mexico to see enough wisdom in building the wall to have it make sense for Mexico to come up with some of the cost.   And don’t be surprised if Mr. Trump once again makes idiots out those who doubtless will continue to question Mr. Trump’s intellect long after he has made them look silly.

No comments:

Post a Comment