9/4/18
Some people have been kind enough to say that yours truly
predicted what became today’s announcement by Rahm Emanuel that he will not seek re-election as Mayor of Chicago. These observers are too kind; I didn’t call this
development in 5/29/18’s RAHM
EMANUEL WILL NOT RUN AGAIN? YOU CAN’T
BE SERIOUS. CAN YOU?. In fact, I went so far as to say in that
piece, and several times since, that I didn’t think that Rahm would drop
out. But I did outline both a plausible
scenario for Mr. Emanuel’s dropping out and a saleable spin in the event he
decided to take such a pass, so, yes, I’ll take credit for that and build upon those
thoughts in this post.
A caution: We can’t
get into the heads of others. We can
only make guesses regarding people’s motivations from what we know of them and,
like most of you, all my knowledge of Rahm Emanuel comes from what I read in
the papers. Any pronouncements I, or
anybody, makes about Mr. Emanuel’s motivations or future must be tempered by
this caveat. Now for some fun.
First, and I hope this doesn’t come as a revelation to
any of my readers, Rahm Emanuel is not finished with politics. He may take a break to make some more money
selling his influence, as a lot of far less talented politicians have done and
continue to do, but he is not going to stay away from the game. He couldn’t if he wanted to and there is no
reason to think he wants to. Besides,
after a while, it becomes difficult to sell influence one no longer has, so
even if Mr. Emanuel wanted only to cash in, he has to keep the larder stocked,
if you will, by staying at least very close to the game and, in all likelihood,
completely re-immersing himself in the game.
Second, as I said back in May,
becoming mayor of Chicago was never Mr. Emanuel’s ultimate goal. He has always had his eye on Washington and one suspects it stays
there. Yours truly has long held that
Mr. Emanuel took his current job in the belief that turning around the, er,
challenge Chicago had become under his predecessor would enable him to get on
the Democratic ticket by acclamation.
Further, Mr. Emanuel actually had the ego to believe that he, and
perhaps only he, could turn around Chicago. It may have become apparent that this goal
is so daunting that it defies even the considerable talents of the wily and insightful
Rahm Emanuel. While he can still create
a plausible story of progress in his rescue mission to this once great city,
solving its problems, or even arresting its decline, is impossible. But bear in mind that, while Mr. Emanuel
clearly has some affection for his city and certainly wishes the best for it, what
really matters to a career politician
like Mr. Emanuel is his political future and viability. Mr. Emanuel can tell a decent story about
his valiant efforts in Chicago, especially with the money and the spinmeisters
he has at his disposal, so, from his perspective, all is good. What
matters to one’s political viability is not success itself but convincing
enough voters of one’s success. As I
said in May,
Mr. Emanuel can leave with a good story, preserving and even enhancing his
chances at moving up the political ladder.
Of course, if he were a real Chicagoan, he would realize that there is
nowhere up the ladder to go once one has won the only job that really matters
to a pol in our fair city. Did Richard J. Daley want to be
president? What? And take a demotion? But I
digress.
Third, the thing that really scares me about Mr. Emanuel’s
packing it in is the implications of his leaving if I am at all right in the
suppositions outlined in the last paragraph.
Has Mr. Emanuel, a smart and insightful guy, admitted to himself, and
maybe very privately to a few close friends, that Chicago is beyond redemption? Has he decided that staying around will only
impair his political future because things can only get worse in Chicago? Again,
to a politician, what really matters is himself or he wouldn’t be in the
business he’s in. Mr. Emanuel is not going
to throw himself on a Didonian pyre in order to save the city of Chicago. If he thinks there’s nowhere to go but down
for Chicago and hence has decided to board a figurative lifeboat, yours truly
genuinely fears for the future of his home town.
Fourth, notice that I have not mentioned the Laquan McDonald case. I don’t think that this sad chapter in
Chicago history is nearly the political issue those comfortably ensconced in
the city’s newsrooms think it is and I hence don’t think that the case had much,
if anything, to do with Mr. Emanuel’s decision. I still think that Mr. Emanuel would have
won, and quite possibly in the first round, had he elected to run. It was not the fear of losing, but, rather,
the consequences of winning, outlined the last two paragraphs, that led to Rahm
Emanuel’s decision.
Fifth, what is Mr. Emanuel’s next step? Given his lack of the likeability factor,
perhaps unelected political office, like a Cabinet position, another stint as presidential
chief of staff, or some kingmaker/political financier position at some lobbying
firm in Washington, a kind of modern day Clark
Clifford role, is in the Mayor’s sights.
But do you really think that Mr. Emanuel believes he’s unlikeable? We are usually the last to see the, er, qualities
that others see in us, and one suspects that Mr. Emanuel thinks he has no
problem at all with likeability and hence will not let such considerations keep
him away from another attempt at elected office. To that end, and, again, this is pure
speculation, yours truly thinks he has his eye on the 2020 Democratic ticket.
Surely, he is smart enough to know that the Dems seem intent on running
to the left in two years; hence, the top of the ticket will feature an Elizabeth Warren type. The ticket will need balance, and who better
to provide that balance than uber-moderate Rahm Emanuel? Not only that, but remember that the spin
that Mr. Emanuel saved Chicago will become imbedded in the American psyche by
that time and he will be able to boast the administrative experience to balance
and enhance the legislative experience of, say, Senator Warren or Senator Kirsten Gillibrand at the top
of the ticket. It makes sense to yours
truly and should make sense to a guy, such as Mr. Emanuel, who knows politics
far more thoroughly and intimately than do I.
Sixth, what does this do to the mayoral race back in
Chicago? There is grist here for plenty
of future posts, so at this time I will limit myself to a few observations. First, this is not a gift to those
unnotables who are already in the race.
Already, they are sounding scared at the prospect of more attractive
candidates, who wisely passed on a run at Mr. Emanuel, entering the race. Second, the ideal candidate would be a
viable Hispanic candidate given the power of that voting bloc and the clear
direction of the city’s future and, currently, there is no such candidate in
the race. That candidate probably is
not Alderman Ricardo Munoz (22nd),
who is already talking about jumping into the race. But it could be. What, by the way, is Luis Gutierrez, who is the biggest Hispanic name in Chicago
politics, is more than decently regarded in the black community, and is soon to
be out of a job, thinking right now?
Third, let’s see how things develop in the next few days or weeks; this
is going to be even more fun if such a thing is possible.
See my two books, The Chairman, A Novel of
Big City Politics and The Chairman’s Challenge,
A Continuing Novel of Big City Politics, for further illumination on
how things work in Chicago and Illinois politics.
Great insights, as always!
ReplyDeleteThanks.
Delete"Has Mr. Emanuel, a smart and insightful guy, admitted to himself, and maybe very privately to a few close friends, that Chicago is beyond redemption?" My idea here, far less informed than Mark's, isn't so much 'beyond redemption' as the Rahmfather knowing that Boss Madigan is sitting silently on his throne rubbing his rat paws in glee. With the pending 12+ candidate scrum, the public service workers union armies and the CTU with their constipationally 'promised' pensions will now demand that their votes will require any 'solution' to Chicago's (and by extension, the state) suffocating budget - deficit swamp to be founded on a "progressive" income tax. JB will fall right in the "more fair share taxes on the rich" party line and the hit certainly won't stop there ... each pol except Valas maybe, will try to outbid the others with income transfer schemes to "help the poor". Rahm, entirely aware how that will dampen corporate relocations and accelerate the exodus, wanted no such dampening of his 'saving' legacy, hence time to cut losses and exit on a high note.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Basher.
DeleteAddendum: In concert, the Eric Zorns and Toni Taxwinkles of the world, along with the Lori Lightfoot league, will dutifully wheedle and coo "well of course, higher and especially progressive income taxes are only reasonable, and logical". ANY mere suggestion of government consolidations and cost savings will be relegated to "well certainly ... as mayor I would engage detailed studies about that". ANY net cuts will be howled down as "hurting the poor" and therefore beyond discussion or debate.
ReplyDelete